Eventually, I realized why: We had given these other review groups some authority. The origin of the creative brain trust was Toy Story. During a crisis that occurred while making that film, a special relationship developed among John, Andrew, Lee, and Joe, who had remarkable and complementary skills.
At Disney, only a small senior group would look at daily animation work. John, who joined my computer group at Lucasfilm after leaving Disney, participated in these sessions while we were creating computer-animated effects for Young Sherlock Holmes. As we built up an animation crew for Toy Story in the early s, John used what he had learned from Disney and ILM to develop our daily review process.
People show work in an incomplete state to the whole animation crew, and although the director makes decisions, everyone is encouraged to comment. There are several benefits. First, once people get over the embarrassment of showing work still in progress, they become more creative. Second, the director or creative leads guiding the review process can communicate important points to the entire crew at the same time.
Third, people learn from and inspire each other; a highly creative piece of animation will spark others to raise their game. The dailies process avoids such wasted efforts. Getting people in different disciplines to treat one another as peers is just as important as getting people within disciplines to do so. Barriers include the natural class structures that arise in organizations: There always seems to be one function that considers itself and is perceived by others to be the one the organization values the most.
In a creative business like ours, these barriers are impediments to producing great work, and therefore we must do everything we can to tear them down. Walt Disney understood this.
He believed that when continual change, or reinvention, is the norm in an organization and technology and art are together, magical things happen. But he did the first sound in animation, the first color, the first compositing of animation with live action, and the first applications of xerography in animation production. He was always excited by science and technology. At Pixar, we believe in this swirling interplay between art and technology and constantly try to use better technology at every stage of production.
Although we are a director- and producer-led meritocracy, which recognizes that talent is not spread equally among all people, we adhere to the following principles:. This means recognizing that the decision-making hierarchy and communication structure in organizations are two different things. The impulse to tightly control the process is understandable given the complex nature of moviemaking, but problems are almost by definition unforeseen.
The most efficient way to deal with numerous problems is to trust people to work out the difficulties directly with each other without having to check for permission. We try to stagger who goes to which viewing to ensure that there are always fresh eyes, and everyone in the company, regardless of discipline or position, gets to go at some point.
We strongly encourage our technical artists to publish their research and participate in industry conferences. Publishing may give away ideas, but it keeps us connected with the academic community. This connection is worth far more than any ideas we may have revealed: It helps us attract exceptional talent and reinforces the belief throughout the company that people are more important than ideas. We try to break down the walls between disciplines in other ways, as well.
One is a collection of in-house courses we offer, which we call Pixar University. It is responsible for training and cross-training people as they develop in their careers. Some screenplay writing, drawing, and sculpting are directly related to our business; some Pilates and yoga are not. In a sculpting class will be rank novices as well as world-class sculptors who want to refine their skills.
Most buildings are designed for some functional purpose, but ours is structured to maximize inadvertent encounters. At its center is a large atrium, which contains the cafeteria, meeting rooms, bathrooms, and mailboxes.
As a result, everyone has strong reasons to go there repeatedly during the course of the workday. Observing the rise and fall of computer companies during my career has affected me deeply. Many companies put together a phenomenal group of people who produced great products. They had the best engineers, exposure to the needs of customers, access to changing technology, and experienced management.
Yet many made decisions at the height of their powers that were stunningly wrongheaded, and they faded into irrelevance. How could really smart people completely miss something so crucial to their survival? Many of the people I knew in those companies that failed were not very introspective. When Pixar became an independent company, I vowed we would be different. It is uncomfortable and hard to be objective. Systematically fighting complacency and uncovering problems when your company is successful have got to be two of the toughest management challenges there are.
But the success of those that followed varied enormously. This caused me to reflect on how to get more out of them. Leaders naturally want to use the occasion to give kudos to their team members.
People in general would rather talk about what went right than what went wrong. And after spending years on a film, everybody just wants to move on. Left to their own devices, people will game the system to avoid confronting the unpleasant.
There are some simple techniques for overcoming these problems. One is to try to vary the way you do the postmortems. The balance between the positive and the negative helps make it a safer environment. In any event, employ lots of data in the review. Most of our processes involve activities and deliverables that can be quantified. We keep track of the rates at which things happen, how often something has to be reworked, whether a piece of work was completely finished or not when it was sent to another department, and so on.
Data can show things in a neutral way, which can stimulate discussion and challenge assumptions arising from personal impressions. Successful organizations face two challenges when bringing in new people with fresh perspectives. One is well-known—the not-invented-here syndrome. The other—the awe-of-the-institution syndrome an issue with young new hires —is often overlooked. The former has not been a problem for us, thank goodness, because we have an open culture: Continually embracing change the way we do makes newcomers less threatening.
Several prominent outsiders who have had a big impact on us in terms of the exciting ideas they introduced and the strong people they attracted were readily accepted.
The bigger issue for us has been getting young new hires to have the confidence to speak up. We do not want people to assume that because we are successful, everything we do is right.
For 20 years, I pursued a dream of making the first computer-animated film. To be honest, after that goal was realized—when we finished Toy Story —I was a bit lost. But then I realized the most exciting thing I had ever done was to help create the unique environment that allowed that film to be made. My new goal became, with John, to build a studio that had the depth, robustness, and will to keep searching for the hard truths that preserve the confluence of forces necessary to create magic.
It has been extremely gratifying to see the principles and approaches we developed at Pixar transform this studio. But the ultimate test of whether John and I have achieved our goals is if Pixar and Disney are still producing animated films that touch world culture in a positive way long after we two, and our friends who founded and built Pixar with us, are gone.
You have 1 free article s left this month. You are reading your last free article for this month. To do this, the Animator must be a good actor. Pixar uses its own proprietary software. Instead, you must master the fundamentals of animation. The right art school will understand this and will teach you to tell engaging stories with authentic characters while remaining tech-forward on the latest animation techniques.
Developing a demo reel that shows off your knack for storytelling, compelling characters, and creative imagery is possibly the most important step on your path toward a top animation studio. That means working with instructors — faculty and visiting artists — who understand what the studios are looking for and who can help you extend your artistic reach. Creative talent and a killer reel will increase your chances of working for a company like Pixar. They encouraged me to apply for the internship at Pixar.
Follow the link for a lesson on Rendering. Click for More. Prev Rendering. This video shows the final stage of production for a scene from the film Luca. In the clip, Giulia rides her bike into the piazza and jumps off. She grabs a fish from the wagon on the back of the bike and waves it in the face of Ercole.
They argue and Giulia rides away. The sets, surfaces, animation, simulation, and lighting are all in place. And the images that were pixelated in the Lighting video are now sharp and clear. This is the version of the film as it was shown in theaters. Rendering turns a virtual 3D scene into a 2D image What is rendering?
0コメント